Syllabus

Master of Social Work

SSWO 553 – Advanced Social Work Practice with Families – Summer B 2018

Credits - 3

Description

This second semester course critically analyzes how contemporary clinical theories explain the inner dynamics and external experiences of family systems. Practical applications of family theory are explored through case examples, role play and self-reflective writing that includes both self-analysis and critique of how sociocultural factors influence how we assess and work with families. Students are exposed to a range of family structures and caregiving systems and also to the larger social contexts of race, social class, age, ability, sexual orientation, gender identification, and culture, which influence the distribution of resources made available to these families. The role of the clinician as activist is explored as students reflect upon what their professional roles will be as community practitioners. Must be enrolled in: Master of Social Work. 

Materials

Required Readings

  • Goldenberg, I., Stanton, M., & Goldenberg, H. (2017). Family therapy: An overview (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
  • Thomlison, B. (2016).  Family Assessment Handbook: An introduction and practical guide to family assessment. (4th Ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.

Learning Objectives and Outcomes

School of Social Work Program Outcomes:

Graduates of the UNE SSWO will demonstrate knowledge, skills, and leadership in the following:

  1. Practice social inclusion to enable people, populations, and communities to fully participate in society, enhance human bonds in the context of cultural diversity and ensure improved quality of life and equitable resource distribution. EPAS Competencies 2 & 3
  2. Engage in culturally-informed relationship building, being respectful of the complexity and diversity of contexts and circumstances. EPAS Competencies 3 & 6
  3. Utilize theories of human behavior, social systems and social inclusion when offering interventions with people and their environments. EPAS Competency 8
  4. Promote ethical reflection, critical consciousness and shared decision-making based in social work values and with consideration of the broader contexts of the world in which we live. EPAS Competency 1
  5. Balance the roles of helpers, activists, and advocates through collaboration with communities to build healthy and sustainable resources. EPAS Competencies 2, 5, & 6
  6. Engage as critical consumers and producers of research as it relates to assessment, intervention and evaluation of clinical and community practices. EPAS Competencies 4, 7, 8 & 9
  7. Practice person-centered and collaborative community partnerships across diverse settings. EPAS Competency 6

Course Outcomes

Upon successful completion of Advanced Clinical Practice with Families students will:

  1.    Apply self-awareness and self-regulation to manage the in influence of personal biases and values in working with diverse clients and constituencies. EPAS 2c (Measured in journal entries)
  2.    Use empathy, reflection, and interpersonal skills to effectively engage diverse clients and constituencies. EPAS 6b (Measured in assignment 1)
  3.    Develop mutually agreed-on intervention goals and objectives based on the critical assessment of strengths, needs, and challenges within clients and constituencies. EPAS 7c (Measured in assignment 2)
  4.    Critically choose and implement interventions to achieve practice goals and enhance capacities of clients and constituencies. EPAS 8a (Measured in assignment 2)
  5.    Facilitate effective transitions and endings that advance mutually agreed-on goals. EPAS 8e (Measured in assignment 2)

Assignments

Weekly Discussions

Discussion Boards:

Discussions are an important part of the learning process in this course. Students are expected to post an initial response to the weekly discussion questions by Saturday, adhering to the requirements outlined in the Discussion Rubric, and to return on at least one additional day of the class week to respond to a minimum of 3 classmates in meaningful and substantive ways. This equates to a minimum of 4 total posts spread over at least two different days. Students are welcome and encouraged to begin posting earlier than Saturday, but Saturday is the latest acceptable day for initial posts.

Writing Assignments, Projects, and Assessments

Family Journal: Each week you will submit a one-page family reflection journal. This reflective writing assignment will relate to one or more of the topics covered in the Thomlinson Family Assessment Handbook. Your weekly journal provides an opportunity for you to think in a reflexive way about important aspects of working with families — reflexive in the sense of how your assumptions, beliefs, and perhaps biases influence the way you experience, interpret, and act with family clients. You are encouraged to push yourself to new realizations and insights in your weekly journal entry. Citations are not required unless you choose to include something from a specific source to enhance your reflective process.

Assignment #1, Comparison of Classic Family Therapy Approaches Paper – Sharon Family Case (Assignment 1): In this 7 to 8-page paper, you will choose one of the classic family therapy models from module 3 (either the transgenerational or the experiential model) and one of the classic family therapy models from module 4 (either the structural or the strategic model) and apply the chosen models to the Case of Sharon and her Family (Thomlison pp. 196-197).

Assignment #2, Social Constructionist Intervention Paper – Del Sol Family Case (Assignment 2): In this 7 to 8-page paper, you will choose either Solution-Oriented (focused) Family Therapy or Narrative Family Therapy and apply the chosen model to the Del Sol Family Case Study (Thomlison pp. 219-222).

Grading and Feedback Method: Grading and feedback methods are provided for each assignment. Please refer to the Learning Modules for more information.

Due Dates: Due dates for all learning activities are provided in the Course Schedule.

Grading Policy

The School of Social Work uses the following grading system for all courses with the exception of field education courses. Students are expected to maintain a “B” (3.0) average over the course of their study. Students with less than a GPA of 3.0 will be placed on academic probation. Students must have an overall GPA of 3.0 in order to receive their Master’s Degree.

Your grade in this course will be determined by the following criteria:

Grade Breakdown

AssignmentPoint ValuePercentage of Grade
Weekly Participation in All Discussions200 points (25 points X 8)20%
Weekly Family Reflection Journal 200 points (25 points X 8 )20%
Assignment #1: Comparison of Classic Family Therapy Approaches Paper - Sharon Family Case300 points30%
Assignment #2: Social Constructionist Intervention Paper - Del Sol Family Case 300 points30%
Total1,000 points100%

Grade Scale

Grade Points Grade Point Average (GPA)
A 94 – 100% 4.00
A- 90 – 93% 3.75
B+ 87 – 89% 3.50
B 84 – 86% 3.00
B- 80 – 83% 2.75
C+ 77 – 79% 2.50
C 74 – 76% 2.00
C- 70 – 73% 1.75
D 64 – 69% 1.00
F 00 – 63% 0.00

Schedule

Course Dates: June 27-August 19

All assignments are to be submitted by 11:59 PM ET on the dates listed below.

Unless otherwise specified below, all module discussions and assignments are due the last day of the module or unit week. Initial discussion posts are due by 11:59 PM Saturday, and responses to classmates are due by the end of the week; except for the early discussion due-dates noted in Module Seven.

Week 1 | Family Relationship Framework, Family Life-cycle, and Familial Culture

Dates: Wednesday, June 27 – Tuesday, July 3

Readings and Video:

  • Week 1 Video Lecture
  • Goldenberg: Chapters 1, 2 and 3
  • Thomlison: Chapters 1 and 2

Discussions:

  • Week 1: Introductions
  • Week 1: The Family Relationship Framework and the Family Lifecycle

Assignment:

  • Week 1 Family Journal: Family Culture

Week 2 | Systems Theory and Ethics in Family Therapy

Dates: Wednesday, July 4  – Tuesday, July 10

Readings and Video:

  • Week 2 Video Lecture
  • Goldenberg: Chapters 4 and 6
  • Thomlison: Chapter 3 

Discussion:

  • Week 2: Ramona and Her Family

Assignment: 

  • Week 2 Family Journal:Normative and Non-normative Events

Week 3 | Transgenerational and Experiential Family Therapy

Dates: Wednesday, July 11  – Tuesday, July 17

Readings and Video:

Discussions:

  • Week 3: Case Study (Fernandez Family)

Assignment:

  • Week 3 Family Journal: What Makes Family Assessment Unique?

 

Week 4 | Structural and Strategic Family Therapy; and Goal Setting in Family Therapy

Dates:  Wednesday, July 18  – Tuesday, July 24

Readings and Video:

  • Week Video Lecture
  • Goldenberg: Chapters 10 and 11
  • Thomlison: Chapters 5 and 6 and Fernandez family case study, p. 214
  • Suggested Lecture (Not Required): Strategic Therapy with Dr. Diane Gehart (2015) (54:42 minutes): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwv0nmWn-cE

Discussions:

  • Week 4: Is “Strengths-based” Present in Structural and Strategic Family Therapy?

Assignments:

  • Week 4 Family Journal: Establishing Strengths-Based Goals in Multigenerational Families
  • Assignment 1: Comparison of Classic Family Therapy Approaches Paper: Sharon Family Case

 

Week 5 |Cognitive and Behavioral Family Therapy and Motivation for Change

Dates: Wednesday, July 25 – Tuesday, July 31

Readings and Video:

Optional Resources:

Discussions:

  • Week 5: Francoise Family Case Study

Assignment:

  • Week 5 Family Journal: MI Strategies and the Francoise Family

 

Week 6 | Social Constructionist Family Therapy

Dates:  Wednesday,  August 1 – Tuesday, August 7

Readings and Video:

Discussion:

  • Week 6: Viewing Life Stories through a Solution-Oriented and Narrative Lens

Assignment:

  • Week 6 Family Journal: Assessment and Evaluation Instruments for Solution Oriented and Narrative-Based Family Therapy

 

Week 7 | Sharing our Social Constructionist Family Interventions with Colleagues

Dates: Wednesday, August 8 – Tuesday, August 14

Reading:

  • Read and evaluate four of your classmates’ papers following the instructions in the Whole-Class Discussion forum

Discussion:

  • Week 7: Peer Evaluation and Feedback

Assignments:

  • Week 7 Family Journal: Peer Evaluation and Feedback
  • Assignment 2:  Social Constructionist Intervention Paper 

 

Week 8 |Reflective Thinking and Reflexive Practice with Families

Dates: Wednesday, August 15 – Sunday, August 19 (Please note the early assignment and discussion due dates the final week) 

Readings:

  • Week 8 Video Lecture
  • Thomlison: Chapter 10
  • Hepworth, Jeri. (2000). The Two-Way Mirror in My Therapy Room, Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 10:4, 9-20, DOI: 10.1300/J085v10n04_02 (A Special Message to Students: Although this article was written a number of years ago it has deep touching relevance to this week’s closing conversation on reflexive practice. Please find some quiet time early in the week to slowly read and reflect on this article, written from the heart by a former family practitioner) To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1300/J085v10n04_02

Discussion:

  • Letters from the Heart

Assignment: 

  • Week 8 Family Journal: Final Family Reflection

Student Resources

Accommodations

Any student who would like to request, or ask any questions regarding, academic adjustments or accommodations must contact the Student Access Center at (207) 221-4438 or pcstudentaccess@une.edu. Student Access Center staff will evaluate the student's documentation and determine eligibility of accommodation(s) through the Student Access Center registration procedure.

Policies

Attendance Policy

Online students are required to submit a graded assignment/discussion prior to Sunday evening at 11:59 pm ET of the first week of the term. If a student does not submit a posting to the graded assignment/discussion prior to Sunday evening at 11:59 pm ET, the student will be automatically dropped from the course for non-participation. Review the full attendance policy.

Late Policy

Assignments: Late assignments will be accepted up to 3 days late; however, there is a 10% grade reduction (from the total points) for the late submission. After three days the assignment will not be accepted.

Discussion posts: If the initial post is submitted late, but still within the discussion board week, there will be a 10% grade reduction from the total discussion grade (e.g., a 3 point discussion will be reduced by 0.3 points). Any posts submitted after the end of the Discussion Board week will not be graded.

Please make every effort ahead of time to contact your instructor and your student support specialist if you are not able to meet an assignment deadline. Arrangements for extenuating circumstances may be considered by faculty.

Student Handbook Online - Policies and Procedures

The policies contained within this document apply to all students in the College of Graduate and Professional Studies. It is each student's responsibility to know the contents of this handbook.

UNE Online Student Handbook

UNE Course Withdrawal

Please contact your student support specialist if you are considering dropping or withdrawing from a course. The last day to drop for 100% tuition refund is the 2nd day of the course. Financial Aid charges may still apply. Students using Financial Aid should contact the Financial Aid Office prior to withdrawing from a course.

Academic Integrity

The University of New England values academic integrity in all aspects of the educational experience. Academic dishonesty in any form undermines this standard and devalues the original contributions of others. It is the responsibility of all members of the University community to actively uphold the integrity of the academy; failure to act, for any reason, is not acceptable. For information about plagiarism and academic misconduct, please visit UNE Plagiarism Policies.

Academic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to the following:

  1. Cheating, copying, or the offering or receiving of unauthorized assistance or information.
  2. Fabrication or falsification of data, results, or sources for papers or reports.
  3. Action which destroys or alters the work of another student.
  4. Multiple submissions of the same paper or report for assignments in more than one course without permission of each instructor.
  5. Plagiarism, the appropriation of records, research, materials, ideas, or the language of other persons or writers and the submission of them as one's own.

Charges of academic dishonesty will be reviewed by the Program Director. Penalties for students found responsible for violations may depend upon the seriousness and circumstances of the violation, the degree of premeditation involved, and/or the student’s previous record of violations.  Appeal of a decision may be made to the Dean whose decision will be final.  Student appeals will take place through the grievance process outlined in the student handbook.